How often have we heard that so and so is such a ‘stud’, such a ‘man’ because he scored with so many women. Men especially, and the whole world apparently look upto this man. Then you have the wicked whispers about the cheap woman. The ‘slut’ actually, who sleeps around. She was intimate with so many men. How cheap! No one looks upto her and even the men she beds don’t have a lot of respect for her. Men all around find it justified to eve tease her or pass lewd comments. God knows what other forms of harassment she will have to put up with, especially in a so called conservative society like ours.
Why must we have this sort of discrimination for women? Isn’t it all basically the same? That it’s a matter of individual choice. Why can’t we let people be? If a man chooses to expose himself to dozens of women, so be it; provided of course that it is consensual and legal. Why can’t it be the same for women? If a woman wishes to voluntarily expose herself to dozens of men, why interfere in her personal choice? That would be truly liberal.
What then happens to ‘good’? Sex is the one topic that will never be resolved as long as man exists. He can’t do without it, can’t condemn it, can’t justify it, and can’t have the same set of rules for him or his neighbour.
Funnily enough the same is true of ‘good’. Man can never have enough of it. He breaks it, bends it, skirts it, buries it, bombs it and strangles it; and yet he can’t do without it. So he digs it up, resuscitates it, glorifies it, honours it and bandages it up.
What to do? shall we simply bury it as another paradox of man? And then dig it up later to look at it from all angles? I have a suggestion – Why not accept it as is? I’m talking of ‘sex’ and ‘good’. And no, I’m not saying combine it to say ‘sex is good’! That’s too simplistic.
Why not tweak the old grey cells a bit?
Man needs to be good or at least have ‘good’ around. The worst pedophile or mass murderer still wants everyone else to be ‘good’ to him. Even in jail, inmates still complain about in-justice if everyone but him is served a meal. So you may be a Hitler and mass murder thousands of Jews, but you still want your frauline Eva Braun to be good to you.
Why not settle the issue as best we can? Why don’t women stop trying to copy the womanising asses? I hardly think its emancipating to expose yourself to dozens of men who don’t care about you. There are better areas to catch up with in the emancipation department. Why not strive for equality at status quo? Why not show the men that it’s emancipated to be a woman on these issues? (Actually it is!) Why not show the men that it’s cool to not sleep around?
that it’s great to be a rejecter than a multi acceptor?
why not promote exclusivity and monogamy?
The idea is not to ‘catch up’ with the men in the Blackbook department.
The idea is to show the men the sexiness of a women’s world of No Blackbooks.
The idea is not to make lady studs, but to show the men how stupid it is to be a stud in the first place. Aren’t studs animals by the way?
If you see a mad man running around naked, isn’t it better to give him a shirt and teach him to how wear clothes rather than taking yours off?? So why not strive for an equalized bedroom behavior? Why not teach the men that monogamy rocks and that studs are not cool?? That would be a truly globalised bedroom. Now you know why they say, there’s not an area globalism hasn’t touched?
October 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment